GRE argument 161提纲分析汇总

所属专题:GRE作文  来源:    要点:GRE考试  
编辑点评: 提纲是作者构思谋篇的具体体现。便于作者有条理地安排材料、展开论证。提纲在GRE写作当中起到了至关重要的作用。从今天起,我们将对GRE argument进行分析,弄清写作思路,这样才能让GRE argument得高分。

难易程度:★★★

题目题材:社会

gre argument 161题目:

In a study of reading habits of Leeville citizens conducted by the University of Leeville, most respondents(1) said they preferred literary classics as reading material. However, a follow-up study(4,5) conducted by the same researchers found that the type of book most frequently checked out(2) of each of the public libraries(6) in Leeville was the mystery novel(3). Therefore, it can be concluded that the respondents in the first study had misrepresented their reading habits(7).

提纲:

(1)We do not know how many, and what kind of citizens responded to the survey, thus the representativeness of the result is open to doubt.

(2)The frequency of certain type of book being checked out from the public libraries is not a good indication of what kind of reading material do citizens prefer.

(3)The author does not analyze to what extent the literary classics and mystery novels mentioned in the argument overlap.

(4)The author fails to provide evidence to show that the result of the follow-up study is representative of all-time reading habits of Leeville citizens.

(5)We do not know how long is the interim period between the two studies, many conditions may change after sufficient long time.

(6)The author unfairly assumes that the respondents in the first study borrow most of their reading materials from public libraries.

(7)The author fails to consider other explanation that could explain the discrepancy between the respondents’ answer and the result of the follow-up study, e.g. if the respondents were forthright, if they correctly understood the survey’s question, etc.

注:题目中括号里的数字表明这句话体现的是提纲中第几号缺陷。

无论是gre issue还是gre argument,考生都应该养成写提纲的习惯。这种提纲式的gre写作练习可以帮助考生锻炼写作的逻辑性,而gre写作高分最重要的得分依据就是作文的逻辑性要强。希望大家都能写出好作文。

>>点击查看GRE作文专题,阅读更多相关文章!

最新2024GRE考试信息由沪江留学网提供。

请输入错误的描述和修改建议,建议采纳后可获得50沪元。

错误的描述:

修改的建议: