Partha has withdrawn its troops from Baltia after five years of occupation. Earlier this year the country of Cardcna began shipping mules to Baltia's resistance fighters to facilitate transport of weapons across Baltia's mountains to the battle areas. Cardena's diplomats now claim that without
Cardena's aid to Baltia's resistance fighters, Partha would not have withdrawn.
Which of the following, if true, casts the most serious doubt on the accuracy of the assertion of Cardena's diplomats?
(A) No precise figures are available concerning the number of mules shipped to Baltia.
(B) During the past year, Cardena shipped weapons and food, as well as mules, to resistance fighters in Baltia.
(C) Last year a new government took power in Partha and decided that national interests were not served by the occupation of Baltia.
(D) Two years ago Partha had no plans to reduce its forces in Baltia.
(E) Resistance fighters in Baltia fought for five years against Partha's occupying troops.
答案：(C)
问题: 下面哪一个如果正确的话,最能反对外交家断言的正确性
读题: 在5年的占领后，P从B撤军。今年的早些时候C开始运送骡子给B的抵抗部队，以方便在B国山区的运输。现在C外交官宣称，没有C的帮助，P不会撤军。
分析:题中第一句话就告诉我们一个事实，P从B撤军了，而C外交家断言说:这是因为C的 帮助，问题是反对C外交官的宣称，也就是要反对原因。
两种weaken反对方式:
1、 直接说到和原因不一样就对。
2、 有其它的原因来解释P为什么撤军(这种题型中这种答案占多数)
B、去年, C运送武器,食物和骡子给B国抵抗部队 support，和原因是相同点。
C、去年P国一个新政府上台，认为占领B并没有获利 weaken, 其他原因解释为什么撤军, 占领并不获利,所以撤军
E、抵抗部队和P国军队战斗了5年。 不要进一步联想是抵抗部队打跑了P，它只是说战斗而已
对于新GRE逻辑阅读，考生除了采取题海战术，其实更应该做的就是总结。如果能从平日的练习中找到解新GRE逻辑阅读题的思路，那么，要比采取题海战术更好。
>>点击查看GRE阅读专题，阅读更多相关文章！
-
如何两个月拿下GRE？
每年都有无数小伙伴在纠结一个问题，两个月备考GRE到底够不够？事实上，全身心准备的话，完全够了。下面我们一起来看看如何备考，有哪些值得我们学习呢？
- GRE的文章源于哪里?
- GRE考前冲刺复习做到这5点提分最有效
- 2017年GRE考试报名开始啦！最新考试时间官方公布快来抢考位
- ETS官网查不了GRE分数怎么办？