GRE argument 165提纲分析汇总

所属专题:GRE作文  来源:    要点:GRE考试  
编辑点评: 提纲是作者构思谋篇的具体体现。便于作者有条理地安排材料、展开论证。提纲在GRE写作当中起到了至关重要的作用。从今天起,我们将对GRE argument进行分析,弄清写作思路,这样才能让GRE argument得高分。

难易程度:★★★

题目题材:健康卫生

gre argument 165题目:

The following appeared in a business magazine.

"As a result of numerous consumer complaints of dizziness and nausea, Promofoods requested that eight million cans of tuna(1) be returned for testing last year. Promofoods concluded that the cans did not, after all, contain chemicals that posed a health risk(5). This conclusion is based on the fact that the chemists from Promofoods tested samples of the recalled cans(2) and found that, of the eight chemicals most commonly blamed for causing symptoms of dizziness and nausea(4), five were not found in any of the tested cans. The chemists did find that the three remaining suspected chemicals(3) are naturally found in all other kinds of canned foods."

提纲:

(1)We do not know how many tuna cans did Promofoods sell in total last year, thus could not evaluate if the eight million return cans are among the batch which caused the problems.

(2)We do not know if tuna cans are the only kind of food Promofoods sell last year, hence we could not evaluate if the test makes any sense.

(3)The author fails to rule out the possibility that it is the three remaining chemicals that resulted in the problem.

(4)The author generalizes too hastily that the tested cans do not contain any chemicals that pose a health risk at all.

(5)The chemists failed to examine the samples for other chemicals or substances that could cause dizziness and nausea.

注:题目中括号里的数字表明这句话体现的是提纲中第几号缺陷。

无论是gre issue还是gre argument,考生都应该养成写提纲的习惯。这种提纲式的gre写作练习可以帮助考生锻炼写作的逻辑性,而gre写作高分最重要的得分依据就是作文的逻辑性要强。希望大家都能写出好作文。

>>点击查看GRE作文专题,阅读更多相关文章!

最新2024GRE考试信息由沪江留学网提供。

请输入错误的描述和修改建议,建议采纳后可获得50沪元。

错误的描述:

修改的建议: