GRE argument 144提纲分析汇总

所属专题:GRE作文  来源:    要点:GRE考试  
编辑点评: 提纲是作者构思谋篇的具体体现。便于作者有条理地安排材料、展开论证。提纲在GRE写作当中起到了至关重要的作用。从今天起,我们将对GRE argument进行分析,弄清写作思路,这样才能让GRE argument得高分。

难易程度:★★★

题目题材:社会

gre argument 144题目:

According to a poll(1) of 200 charitable organizations, donations of money to nonprofit groups increased by nearly 25 percent last year, though not all charities gained equally. Religious groups gained the most (30 percent), followed by environmental groups (23 percent), whereas educational institutions experienced only a very small increase in donations (3 percent)(2,3). This poll indicates that more people(5) are willing(6) and able to give money to charities but that funding for education is not a priority for most people. These differences in donation rates must result from the perception(4) that educational institutions are less in need of donations than are other kinds of institutions.

提纲:

(1)The size of the sample, procedure of sampling could be cast doubt on.

(2)We cannot evaluate the statistics provided by the author because we do not know the base amount of donations each group received the year before last.

(3)The amount of donations received by educational institutions is not necessarily lower than others since they may receive donations from many other ways.

(4)No evidence is provided to show that it is the people’s perception suggested by the author that resulted in the differences in donation rates.

(5)We cannot infer from the argument that more people are giving money to charities.

(6)People may donate their money for other purpose, thus the assumption that people are willing to give money is open to doubt.

注:题目中括号里的数字表明这句话体现的是提纲中第几号缺陷。

无论是gre issue还是gre argument,考生都应该养成写提纲的习惯。这种提纲式的gre写作练习可以帮助考生锻炼写作的逻辑性,而gre写作高分最重要的得分依据就是作文的逻辑性要强。希望大家都能写出好作文。

>>点击查看GRE作文专题,阅读更多相关文章!

最新2024GRE考试信息由沪江留学网提供。

请输入错误的描述和修改建议,建议采纳后可获得50沪元。

错误的描述:

修改的建议: