GRE argument 107题目：
The following appeared in an editorial in the Seatown newspaper.
"Seatown has a large port exclusively for fishing boats, whose owners pay fees for the upkeep of the docks and for facilities for cleaning engines and repairing nets. In recent years, declining fish populations have decreased fishing revenue and forced many owners to stop fishing altogether. As a result, the port has a high vacancy rate and port managers are considering allowing pleasure boats, including cruise ships and other large vessels, to use the port in order to increase revenue. But allowing pleasure boats into the port would be a mistake, because the fishing boats would be forced out of the port(3). We should preserve the port for the fishing fleet(1,2), which, unlike pleasure boats, contributes to the prosperity of Seatown(4)."
(1)In the absence of data concerning the total amount of fishing boats which still need the port, the necessity of the author’s recommendation is unfounded.
(2)The author fails to consider the negative effects of preserving the port for fishing fleet.
(3)The author ignores other possible settlement for fishing fleet besides preserving the whole port for them.
(4)The author unfairly assumes that only fishing boats could contribute to the prosperity of Seatown.
无论是GRE issue还是GRE argument，考生都应该养成写提纲的习惯。这种提纲式的GRE写作练习可以帮助考生锻炼写作的逻辑性，而GRE写作高分最重要的得分依据就是作文的逻辑性要强。