GRE argument 67提纲分析汇总

所属专题:GRE作文  来源:    要点:GRE考试  
编辑点评: 很多参加GRE的考生在做GRE写作的时候都没有写提纲的习惯,这是非常不好的。提纲在GRE写作当中起到了至关重要的作用。从今天起,我们将对GRE argument进行分析,弄清写作思路,这样才能让GRE argument得高分。

难易程度:★★★

题目题材:城市

gre argument 67题目:

The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a newspaper serving the villages of Castorville and Polluxton.

"Both the villages of Castorville and Polluxton have experienced sharp declines in the numbers of residents who pay property taxes(1). To save money and improve service, the two villages recently merged their once separate garbage collection departments into a single department located in Castorville, and the new department has reported few complaints about its service(2). Last year the library in Polluxton had 20 percent fewer users than during the previous year(3). It follows that we should now further economize and improve service(5), as we did with garbage collection(4), by closing the library in Polluxton(6) and using the library in Castorville to serve both villages(7)."

提纲:

(1)The number of residents who pay property taxes does not necessarily indicate the actual number of residents in the two villages, and the actual amount of taxes collected by the two villages.

(2)Few complaints about new department’s service do not indicate that citizens are satisfied with its service.

(3)The situation in Polluxton’s library may not be typical.

(4)Garbage collection service and library are not comparable.

(5)No evidence could guarantee that emergence of the two libraries could improve service.

(6)The author does not provide any information about the number of users at the two libraries, thus we cannot evaluate whether we should close the library in Polluxton if the emergence is indeed necessary.

(7)The author fails to consider the cost and other possible negative effects of merging the two libraries.

注:题目中括号里的数字表明这句话体现的是提纲中第几号缺陷。

无论是gre issue还是gre argument,考生都应该养成写提纲的习惯。这种提纲式的gre写作练习可以帮助考生锻炼写作的逻辑性,而gre写作高分最重要的得分依据就是作文的逻辑性要强。

>>点击查看GRE作文专题,阅读更多相关文章!

最新2024GRE考试信息由沪江留学网提供。

请输入错误的描述和修改建议,建议采纳后可获得50沪元。

错误的描述:

修改的建议: